Despite the extreme gravity of the facts described below, the Government of Mozambique and its competent justice institutions have, to date, maintained an alarming posture of silence and inaction. This continued absence of public clarification in a matter involving alleged transnational drug trafficking, foreign criminal networks, and apparent failures of judicial control cannot reasonably be interpreted as a mere procedural delay or institutional oversight.
In a democratic state governed by the rule of law, prolonged institutional silence in the face of such serious allegations constitutes a form of responsibility in itself. Under these circumstances, silence ceases to be neutral and becomes an implicit acknowledgment of failure, negligence, or tolerance. By refusing to inform, explain, or account to the public, the authorities deepen suspicions of institutional capture, erode public trust, and reinforce the perception that impunity prevails over justice. Where the State remains silent, accountability collapses—and where accountability collapses, responsibility is no longer speculative but inferred from omission.
Background of the Case
Citizens and civil entities issuing this statement express deep concern regarding the conduct of Mozambican justice institutions, particularly the Office of the Attorney General (Procuradoria-Geral da República – PGR), headed by Américo Letela, following events widely reported in regional and international media.
On 25 November 2025, authorities in Botswana arrested six Mexican nationals allegedly linked to the operation of a drug production laboratory on Mozambican territory. These arrests exposed serious weaknesses in the fight against drug trafficking, in the handling of criminal proceedings, and in the protection of the public interest.
According to information released by Botswana media, the individuals arrested were:
• Gumecindo Contreras Enriquez, 61
• José Alfredo Madera Pena, 48
• Francisco Alejandro, 33
• José Ángel Corrales, 39
• Carlos Alberto Torres Aguilar, 32
• David Hernández Teran, 26
The same sources indicate that these individuals were wanted by Mozambican authorities for serious crimes related to drug trafficking and criminal association, yet they left Mozambique after being granted provisional release on bail, despite the gravity and transnational nature of the alleged crimes.
Additional Arrest and Further Concerns
In the same case, a 53-year-old Nigerian citizen was arrested and accused of facilitating the illegal entry of these individuals into Botswana. Particularly troubling is the fact that this individual was also released on bail, raising serious questions regarding the criteria applied by the courts, especially with respect to flight risk, network facilitation, and international organized crime cooperation.
Unanswered Questions Demanding Public Clarification
These events give rise to urgent and legitimate questions that require immediate clarification by the Mozambican Attorney General’s Office:
1. What criminal proceedings were formally initiated in Mozambique against the above-mentioned individuals, and which legal classifications of crimes were applied?
2. On what legal grounds was provisional release granted, considering the seriousness of the alleged crimes, their international dimension, and the evident risk of flight?
3. What precautionary measures were imposed, including passport seizure, travel bans, periodic reporting, or electronic monitoring?
4. How were the defendants able to leave Mozambique without effective intervention by competent authorities?
5. Have internal investigations or disciplinary proceedings been initiated against magistrates, prosecutors, or public officials whose actions or omissions may have enabled this outcome?
To date, no official answers have been publicly provided.
Institutional Silence and Public Perception
The continued silence of the Attorney General’s Office and the competent courts significantly worsens public perception of the justice system’s fragility. This silence fuels suspicions of gross negligence, undue protection, or even complicity with transnational organized crime networks.
The lack of transparency in cases of this magnitude is not neutral. On the contrary, it undermines citizens’ trust in institutions, weakens international confidence in the Mozambican State, and risks positioning Mozambique as a preferred corridor for drug trafficking and organized crime.
Serious Allegations Concerning the Attorney General
In public discourse and civil society commentary, serious allegations have been raised concerning Américo Letela, including claims that:
• He allegedly accumulated wealth through drug trafficking-related networks;
• He is accused of acting as one of the facilitators sustaining drug distribution structures;
• He allegedly rose to power by guaranteeing the flow of illicit goods;
• He is accused of abusing his authority to harass female magistrates, including allegations of offering travel arrangements to meet them abroad;
• It is alleged that magistrates who refused such advances were subsequently persecuted and had their careers damaged;
• He is described by critics as a central figure in systemic corruption, with claims that those who refuse to participate in corrupt practices are subjected to intimidation.
Additionally, for security reasons, it is alleged that his spouse currently resides in South Africa, while their two children are reportedly studying in England.
These claims are presented here as allegations circulating in public discourse, which, given their seriousness, demand either substantiated investigation or formal public refutation by the competent authorities.
Formal Demands
In light of the above, the Attorney General’s Office of Mozambique is hereby called upon to:
• Issue an urgent public statement clarifying the status of the proceedings, the judicial decisions taken, and the institutional responsibilities involved;
• Disclose any internal investigations or disciplinary actions initiated in connection with these events;
• Reaffirm its constitutional commitment to legality, transparency, equality before the law, and the fight against organized crime.
Conclusion
The rule of law cannot exist where opacity prevails over accountability. Justice loses legitimacy when it fails to act decisively and transparently in the face of crimes that threaten national security and international confidence.
Mozambique cannot continue to be associated with impunity, the escape of alleged criminals, and the silent erosion of justice, while citizens bear the consequences of insecurity, violence, and institutional distrust.
The central question remains unavoidable: who is corrupt in Mozambique—and who is protected by silence?
