By Kestér Kenn Klomegâh*
From various interpretations, Russia is taking advantage of the past Soviet-era connections and Africa’s growing dissatisfaction and disappointment with the Western world, still its economic presence (footprints) remain marginal compared to other key foreign players. Despite the fact that Western and European powers are experiencing falling influence, they are far ahead of Russia – especially considering its much-praised global status. As already known, China is the main player on the continent.
It is an established fact that Russia has sought to convince African leaders, the elite and middle-class over the past years in regard to the likely dangers of neo-colonial tendencies perpetrated by the former colonial masters and their scramble for resources on the continent. Obviously, Russia has taken the most difficult task – reminiscent of the Cold War, particularly in the 1980s when East-West confrontation reached its heights and finally led to collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.
Some international and African experts – and even political leaders, seriously argue that the best way to fight neocolonialism is to invest in order to jostle for the same competitive economic influence. Russia has highly criticised foreign players -including the United States and European Union members’ relations with Africa. On the other side, Moscow believes that it is absolutely open for cooperation with everyone for mutual benefit, while it seemingly deepens differences which currently threaten African unity.
In practical terms, Russia’s policy largely has numerous setbacks and potholes; but officials have now began acknowledging them step by step. The most common attitude is too-loud noise on its dream – characterised by anti-Western confrontations – of returning as a late-comer to Africa. Russia has shown high-grade symbolism and excelled in political dialogue with African leaders. Results from its economic policy initiatives are relatively little, and are invisible across Africa. Russia’s approach brings only a few concrete results relating to badly-needed economic development, investment in infrastructure and the agricultural sector to ensure food security, and providing finance for its African partners.
Nevertheless, in trying to understand whether Russia has a genuine development-oriented policy toward Africa, it is only necessary to list development projects that it has undertaken and completed since the Soviet collapse. During these past years, Russia hoped to be part of Europe and develop trade from Lisbon to Vladivostok – which has been the popular post-Soviet dream. It has even reflected in foreign travels among the spectrum of its population. Moscow today is still not a popular holiday destination for Africa’s 380 million middle-class.
The first and second summits were held under the motto ‘For Peace, Security and Development’, and attracted a large number of African representatives. As Russia prepares to strengthen its overall corporate economic profile during the next African leaders’ summits, many Russian policy experts are questioning bilateral agreements that were signed – many of them largely not implemented – with various African countries.
At the prestigious Moscow-based Institute for African Studies, well-experienced policy researchers such as Professors Vladimir Shubin and Alexandra Arkhangelskaya have argued that Russia needs to be more strategic in aligning its interests; and be more proactive with instruments and mechanisms in promoting economic cooperation in order to reap the benefits of a fully-fledged partnership.
“The most significant positive sign is that Russia has moved away from its low-key strategy to vigorous relations, and authorities are seriously showing readiness to compete with other foreign players. But, Russia needs to find a strategy that really reflects the practical interests of Russian business and African development needs,” said Arkhangelskaya, who is also a professor at the Moscow High School of Economics.
Currently, the signs for Russia-African relations are impressive – declarations of intentions have been made, a lot of important bilateral agreements signed; now it remains to be seen how these intentions and agreements entered into over these years will be implemented in practice, she pointed out in an interview.
The revival of Russia-African relations has to be enhanced in all fields. Obstacles to the broadening of Russia-African relations have to be addressed more vigorously. These include, in particular, the lack of knowledge or information in Russia about the situation in Africa and vice versa, suggested Arkhangelskaya.
Russia has not implemented 92 already-signed bilateral agreements – even from 2019 Sochi summit – and largely not delivered on its words concerning engagement in various economic sectors of African countries. There have been several development-oriented initiatives in these years, without tangible results. Over the years, attempts have been made to understand Russia’s financial capabilities and inconsistent approach in implementing bilateral policy projects across Africa.
As expected, those weaknesses were compiled and incorporated in the ‘Situation Analytical Report’ by 25 policy researchers headed by Professor Sergey Karaganov, Faculty Dean at Moscow’s High School of Economics. This 150-page report was presented in November 2021, offering new directions and recommendations for improving policy methods and approaches with Africa.
Another policy report, titled ‘Ways to Increase the Efficiency of Russia’s African Strategy under the Crisis of the Existing World Order’, co-authored by Professors Irina O. Abramova and Leonid L. Fituni castigated or reprimanded authorities who are squeezed between illusions and realities with policy ambitions in Africa. Against the backdrop of geopolitical changes and great power competition, Russian authorities really need to have an insight/understanding into the practical investment and economic possibilities on the continent.
The authors said that: “It is time for Russia, which over the past 30 years has unsuccessfully sought to become part of the West, to abandon illusions and reconsider its foreign economic and policy strategy, reorienting itself to states that are turning from outsiders into significant players in the international political and economic space and are willing to interact with our country on a mutually beneficial and equal basis”.
In addition, the report underlined the fact that Russia’s elite demonstrates a somewhat arrogant attitude toward Africa. High-ranking officials have often used the phrase ‘We (that is, Russia) are not Africa’ to oppose attempts at changing the status quo, to change the approach toward Africa. Despite the thoughtless imposition of the idea that Africa is the most backward and problematic region of the world in Russian public opinion, qualified Africanists – including Western experts, call Africa the continent of the 21st century: attributing this to the stable growth rates of the African economy at least over the past 20 years, and the colossal resource and human potential of the African region.
The report acknowledges the fact that African countries consider Russia as a reliable economic partner, and it is necessarily interacting with African public and private businesses on a mutually beneficial basis. In this regard, Russian initiatives should be supported by real steps and not be limited to verbal declarations about the “return of Russia to Africa”, especially after the Sochi gathering which was described as very symbolic.
The authors however warned that failure on Russia’s side to show financial commitment, African leaders and elites from the Anglophone, Francophone and Lusophone nations will still be loyal and inseparably linked by nostalgic post-colonial master relationships. And this relates to furtherance of economic investment and development, education and training – all to be controlled by the former colonial powers as African leaders choose development partners with funds to invest in the economy.
In the wake of changing geopolitical situations and emerging challenges in Africa, foreign partners are constantly reviewing their economic prospects and robustly investing in order to tackle long-term sustainable development goals, while African countries are making choices based on their development needs. The result is that observers and opinion-makers struggle to understand the nitty-gritty of who is playing at what, where and how.
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has always reminded that the African direction is one of Russia’s priorities, and further praised Africa for its contribution to the development of a fairer and more democratic polycentric (multipolar) world order, and to the settlement of current problems. “Russia actively contributed to the independence of African countries and the development and strengthening of their states. Today, we maintain friendly relations that are spearheading into the future,” he noted.
On taking partnership with Africa to a new level, he unreservedly said: “African countries play a prominent role in international affairs and take an active position in solving topical issues of modern world politics and economics. Progress in the economic and social spheres, improving the quality of life on the African continent contributes to this.”
In his view, “This new stage and this new quality of relations should be based on common values, support for values of justice, equality and respect for the right of nations to independently choose their future. It is within this framework that Russia continues to coordinate positions at international platforms and makes joint-efforts in the interest of stability on the African continent”.
Unlike Western countries, European Union members and Asian countries which focus particularly on what they want to achieve with Africa, Russia places the anti-colonial fight at the core of its policy. In short, Russia knows what it wants from the continent: access to markets, political support and general influence. Now it is time for African leaders to clarify what they want concretely from Russia in return in the lead-up to future Russia-Africa summits, and special foreign ministerial conferences.
Notwithstanding policy complexities and shortfalls, African leaders still appreciate Russia’s popular expressions for winning their geopolitical ambitions. That Russian-African relations are based on long-standing traditions of friendship and solidarity, the Soviet Union supported the struggle of African peoples against colonialism, racism and apartheid, protected their independence and sovereignty, and helped establish statehood and the foundations of national economies, according to historical archive documents.
*Kestér Kenn Klomegâh has a diverse work experience in the field of business intelligence and consultancy. His focused research interest includes geopolitical changes, foreign relations and economic development related questions in Africa with external countries. Klomegâh has media publications, policy monographs and e-handbooks.
