Aftermath of Ghana’s 2024 Elections: A Nation on Edge

By Jessica Ahedor

The 2024 elections in Ghana, once celebrated as a cornerstone of democratic resilience in Africa, have left the country grappling with a tense and uncertain aftermath. Allegations of electoral malpractice, delayed results, and incidents of violence have cast a shadow over the process, challenging Ghana’s democratic stability. The nation’s political and social equilibrium now hangs precariously, as all eyes turn to leaders, institutions, and citizens to restore order and trust.

The Contested Results

Electoral Commissioner Jean Mensa’s announcement that results from nine constituencies were under contention has become the flashpoint of post-election unrest. Mensa explained that discrepancies raised by candidates and political parties necessitated a delay in declaring both parliamentary and presidential outcomes in those areas.

“The Commission is committed to upholding the integrity of Ghana’s elections, and every concern will be addressed before results are declared,” she assured during a press briefing.

However, this delay has ignited protests and accusations of electoral tampering. Political candidates representing these constituencies have alleged attempts to manipulate votes in favor of their opponents. This deepened mistrust, prompting aggrieved party loyalists to suspect that the EC was complicit in undermining the democratic process.

Rising Tensions and Acts of Violence

In the wake of the EC’s delayed announcements, some youths resorted to violence, targeting state institutions in acts of protest and vandalism. One of the most severe incidents occurred in Ayensuano in the Eastern Region, where an EC office was set ablaze. The violence also spread to institutions such as Ghana Gas, Ghana Ports and Harbours Authority, and the National Disaster Management Organisation (NADMO), with reports of damage to property and disruptions to operations.

The Ghana Police Service has since arrested nine suspects linked to the arson at Ayensuano. A total of 106 individuals have been detained across the country in connection with similar incidents of post-election violence. Law enforcement agencies have pledged to maintain order, with a spokesperson stating, “We are determined to protect communities and ensure peace during this turbulent time.”

Richard Kumador, a security expert, underscored the importance of a robust response from security forces to prevent further escalation. “The role of security agencies in maintaining impartiality and order is critical at such times. Their proactive engagement could be the difference between chaos and stability,” he noted.

Leadership Responses

President-elect John Mahama has taken a firm stance against the violence, condemning attacks on state institutions and urging his supporters to exercise restraint. In a national address on December 10, Mahama appealed to the perpetrators of violence to cease their actions immediately.

“I direct all persons purported to be supporters of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) to stop engaging in criminal activities. This is not who we are as a people or as a party,” Mahama stated emphatically.

He further called on outgoing President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo to take decisive action to address the unrest and protect the country. “Until January 7, 2025, President Akufo-Addo remains the leader of this nation. He must take decisive action to protect lives, property, and the sanctity of our democracy,” Mahama said.

Akufo-Addo’s silence on the violence has drawn criticism from some quarters, with analysts emphasizing the need for immediate intervention to restore public confidence in the state’s ability to manage the crisis.

The Impact on Institutions

The unrest has raised broader concerns about Ghana’s democratic institutions, particularly the Electoral Commission. Allegations of vote tampering have eroded trust in the EC, with many Ghanaians questioning its ability to manage elections impartially.
Senyo Hosi, a finance and policy analyst, stressed the need for greater transparency to rebuild trust in the EC. “Ghana must rise above partisan conflicts.

We need a framework where the EC is held accountable while ensuring that aggrieved parties channel their frustrations through legal and non-violent means,” Hosi stated.

Similarly, legal expert Nana Ato Dadzie warned of the long-term consequences of the violence on Ghana’s democratic legacy. “Elections are a cornerstone of democracy, and any perceived or actual manipulation undermines the very fabric of our governance. The destruction of state property not only deepens mistrust but also sets a dangerous precedent,” he remarked.

Navigating the Way Forward

As Ghana grapples with these challenges, the nation must confront the systemic issues exposed by the 2024 elections. Restoring trust in electoral processes, ensuring political accountability, and maintaining security are paramount to preserving the country’s democratic legacy.

The Electoral Commission faces mounting pressure to resolve the disputed results swiftly and transparently. Legal experts and civil society leaders have called for independent audits of the contested constituencies to ensure the credibility of the final outcomes.

Additionally, there are growing demands for reforms that will make the EC more accountable in future elections.
Political leaders also have a critical role to play. While Mahama’s call for calm is a significant step, other political figures must join in discouraging violence and fostering dialogue. The NPP and NDC leadership must prioritize national unity over partisan interests, working collaboratively to address the underlying grievances of their supporters.

Civil society and international observers have a role in mediating tensions and facilitating reconciliation. Ghana’s history of peaceful transitions offers a roadmap for navigating this crisis. As Nana Ato Dadzie aptly observed, “Ghana’s democracy has been tested, but it is not broken. This is an opportunity to learn, reform, and reaffirm our commitment to the principles of democracy.”

Meanwhile, security agencies must step up their efforts to contain the violence. Richard Kumador emphasized the need for impartiality and preparedness among law enforcement. “The police and military must be neutral arbiters in this process. Their ability to act decisively and impartially can make the difference between order and chaos,”